What do you think the odds are that any of the cable news programs will cover this story, much less obsess for months over it?:
The 18-year-old son of Arizona's Senate president confessed that he and another counselor in a youth camp shoved broomsticks and flashlights into the rectums of 18 children (ages 11-14) on at least 40 incidents last June.
Yavapai County prosecutors say they will drop all but one assault charge and likely recommend little or no jail time if 18-year-old Clifton Bennett agrees to plead guilty.
A similar agreement has been offered to co-defendant Kyle Wheeler, 19, who faces an additional assault charge for choking three of the boys until they passed out.
Bennett and Wheeler were arrested in January and charged with 18 counts of aggravated assault and 18 counts of kidnapping because the victims were held down.
Under the plea agreements Bennett and Wheeler could face a maximum two years in prison. But the court could reduce the charges to a misdemeanor and no jail time.
Prosecutors have told parents that they are going to recommend Bennett and Wheeler get five days in jail on the one count, said Lynne Cadigan, a lawyer for two victims.
"If you rape 18 women, would you only be charged with one count?" she said.
The parents want Bennett and Wheeler to face sexual-assault charges, undergo psychosexual evaluations and spend several days in jail per victim.
"Our biggest concern is that these kids are going to do it again," said the mother of an 11-year-old Tucson boy. "My son had something shoved up his butt seven or eight times. If that's not sexual assault, what is?"
The 18 Arizona kids were among the state's top student leaders at a weeklong camp in Prescott to learn student government leadership skills.
Public records show that Bennett and Walker were assigned to stay in a cabin with the boys. In the first hours of camp, Bennett and Wheeler announced that campers who broke rules would get a "brooming."
They were punished for flatulence, making messes, not following rules and sometimes for no reason at all, records show.
Prosecuting attorney James Landis explained the plea agreement in court, saying the "broomsticking" was a hazing ritual and a punishment, not sexual assault.
But legal experts, sex-crimes prosecutors and victims'-rights lawyers say the acts clearly fit the definition of sexual assault.
The pleas, which describe the assault charge as "a non-dangerous, non-repetitive offense," have outraged parents who say their sons were victims of violent sexual attacks. The boys, who were 11 to 14 years old at the time, have had trouble going to the bathroom, sleep with clothes on, are afraid at night, and have undergone sexual-assault counseling.
Landis said in court that the case was never viewed as "sexual in nature," in part because prosecutors could not prove Bennett and Wheeler had sexual intent. Parents of the victims said Landis told them privately that the incidents occurred while the boys had on clothes or swimsuits and that there was no evidence the defendants are homosexuals.
"We would certainly start from a different perspective if it was girls (as victims)," he said in court.
This from an Arizonan DA in 2006??
I've got to believe that Landis couldn't possibly have meant any of what he said, that he was being the 'good soldier,' and keeping the party faith. He was speaking as a lawyer who forgot who his clients are: The citizens of Arizona. Not the Republican Party machine, but the people of the state of Arizona.
Those good people of Arizona are now coming face-to-face with the problem that people all around the country are starting to become aware of: No public authority exists to protect citizens, their children and their interests when Republicans are in charge. Republicans serve their party, and are loyal and obedient to the party alone. When party becomes more important than the public it's supposed to serve, democracy is stood on its' head.
I have been regularly impressed by Republicans' choice of the image that they are willing to project to the public. Republicans invariably choose to be thought of as being loyal rather than being smart and making wise decisions. They reach, sink really, to the lowest common perceptions among themselves, in the name of party loyalty. Even when it means that to believe what they're saying, they must be dumber than stumps. "So what if the course that we chart drives this buggy over the edge of the earth to our doom? We'll be there with you every inch of the way."
George H. W. Bush's choice of Dan 'potatoe' Quayle as a "heartbeat away from the Presidency." Clarence Thomas as "the best candidate" for the Supreme Court. "World renowned heart surgeon" Bill Frist diagnosing Terri Schiavo on videotape from the floor of the Senate. Just some of the more notable examples of the phenomenon.
Touting loyalty over intelligence has obviously worked for Republicans - they had the last two Democratic Presidential candidates running from any possibility of being considered more intelligent than George W. Bush. Neither Gore nor Kerry (nor any of the Democratic Party's representatives) bothered to explain to the American people exactly why intelligence might be a valuable trait for the leader of the free world. Or why it might be preferable for anyone working in the public sector, where public servants have the power to deprive us of our liberty and lives.
Whatever the reason, political cronyism or sheer stupidity, for a professional in the justice system not to recognize that a phallic object shoved into another person's orifice (be it mouth, vagina or rectum) is sexual in nature should be grounds for dismissal. For costing Arizona's taxpayers a heap o'cash when the victims and their families win their lawsuits against the state, for starters.
...experts who specialize in sex crimes say sexual intent is rarely a factor in charging sexual assault; and sexual orientation has nothing to do with it.
"They could have been charged with sexual assault," said Sue Eazer, supervisor of the Pima County Attorney's Special Victims Unit. "Sexual assault is oftentimes not motivated by sexual desire."
Eazer said she has prosecuted several sexual-assault cases involving objects being shoved into children's body cavities.
"It makes no difference to me if it is a male or female (victim)," she said, adding that intent can be a factor in cases of child molestation, where a parent might be accused of touching an infant while changing a diaper.
Would the police in the Abner Louima case have to have shown evidence of being homosexual in order for Landis to have prosecuted them for sexual assault?
The Yavapai County case has national implications for the legal system, said Andrew Vachss, a lawyer specializing in child cases and a best-selling author who uses profits from his books to fund legal work for abused kids.
"This is a theory of prosecution that is based on taking the word of the perpetrators," Vachss said in a phone interview from his New York office. "That's what you have juries for . . . Let the perps tell a jury, 'I inserted a foreign object into the rectums of little boys, but I had no sexual intent.' "
Vachss, who was asked to comment on the case by The Arizona Republic, said most state laws on sexual assault require only insertion, not intent.
He called the issue of intent a "red herring" meant to distract from the fact that a deal is being cut.
"The bottom line is you don't have to prove sexual intent when you have such gross assault," he said. "It looks like one of the most sweetheart deals of all time."
Vachss pointed to a sexual-assault case that was described as hazing in Mepham, Pa. Three football players used golf balls, pine cones and broomsticks to sodomize three other players during training camp last year. All of the defendants were charged with sexual assault.
Bennett's father, Senate President Ken Bennett, R-Prescott, sat behind his son in court.A Prescott native and influential businessman, he has said little publicly about the case. After his son's arrest, he issued a brief statement expressing concern as a parent.
Lawyers for Bennett declined to comment. But in a letter to the Yavapai County attorney, Bennett's lawyers said he immediately "took responsibility for his role, showed remorse and admitted that this 'hazing' was inappropriate."
What do the perps have to say?:
In court last week, Bennett apologized for his role. "The actions that occurred there, none of us considered the consequences that would follow," Bennett said. "The next time I saw these boys, I never expected to see them here."
Bennett said he was "trying every way he can to rectify the situation."
Parents of the victims described Bennett's remarks as self-serving.
Ya think? Here's my favorite part of this story:
[The lawyers] described Bennett as an honor student and active member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, planning to go on a mission in September. "A felony conviction for assault will make his desire to complete his mission impossible," they wrote.
Cadigan [lawyer for two of the victims] said allowing Bennett to go on a mission is preposterous. Both he and Wheeler need psychological counseling and should be in a place where their actions, particularly among children, can be observed, she said.
"Could he be a perpetrator in the future?" she asked.
Does the Pope...?
"Ah, it's good to be republiKING!" (But, hopefully, not much longer.)